Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Smith v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2016cv01495
Petitioner:
Jamel Antoine Smith
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mhoon v. Metropolitan Government for Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2016cv01751
Plaintiff:
Edgar Mhoon
Defendant:
Metropolitan Government for Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee , Daron Hall , Tony M. Wilkes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Smith v. Pixley et al
as 2:2016cv00250
Plaintiff:
Dejon Antoine Smith
Defendant:
W. Pixley, B. Perkins, R. Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv01407
Petitioner:
Antoine Smith
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. State of Florida et al
as 3:2015cv01333
Petitioner:
Antoine Smith
Respondent:
State of Florida and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Irvin v. Mr. Irvin Enterprises et al
as 1:2015cv02444
Plaintiff:
Matthew Irvin
Defendant:
Mr. Irvin Enterprises, Brian Kemp, Fulton County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Woods et al
as 1:2015cv00011
Plaintiff:
Antoine Smith
Defendant:
Bruce Woods, CCA Corporation, Avril Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antoine Smith v. Andrew Hurst, et al
as 13-6385
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTOINE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDREW HURST, NORMAN LEWIS, DOUGLAS TACKETT and others
United States v. Antoine Smith
as 13-2921
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Antoine Smith
Antoine Smith v. Reddinger
as 13-1957
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTOINE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER REDDINGER, in his official capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
