Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atos IT Solutions and Services, Inc. v. ACT, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00082
Plaintiff:
Atos IT Solutions and Services, Inc.
Defendant:
ACT, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv06879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ace American Insurance Company v. Atos IT Solutions and Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01308
Plaintiff:
Ace American Insurance Company
Defendant:
Atos IT Solutions and Services, Inc., Estate of Gary Martinich, Estate of Virginia Tyler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3611
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
GHRIST v. ATOS IT SOLUTIONS AND SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2017cv01514
Defendant:
ATOS IT SOLUTIONS AND SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E. GHRIST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
No Magic Inc v. Atos IT Solutions and Services Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00282
Plaintiff:
No Magic Inc
Defendant:
Atos IT Solutions and Services Inc and Bull HN Information Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00298
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hudson Communications Inc v. Atos IT Solutions and Services, et al
as 16-1919
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HUDSON COMMUNICATIONS INC
Defendant - Appellee:
ATOS IT SOLUTIONS AND SERVICES INC, FKA Siemens IT Solutions and Services Inc, JOHN DOES 1-10 and ABC CORP 1-10
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
