Cases 21 - 30 of 65
Jones v. Oakland County Government et al
as 1:2018cv00555
Plaintiff:
Bryan Jones
Defendant:
Oakland County Government, Royal Oak, City of, Southfield, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2018cv11064
Plaintiff:
Samuel C. Rogers
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission, Attorney Grievance Commission and others
In Re Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Furrer
as 2:2018mc00024
Petitioner:
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland
Respondent:
David Eugene Furrer
Cause Of Action: Disbarment Proceedings
Thomas v. Bernstein et al
as 5:2018cv10297
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Thomas
Defendant:
Richard Bernstein, Joan Larsen, Stephen Markman and others
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Jason Edward Rheinstein
as 17-2127
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND
Defendant - Appellant:
JASON EDWARD RHEINSTEIN
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Rheinstein
as 1:2017cv02550
Plaintiff:
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland
Defendant:
Jason Edward Rheinstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Maldonado v. Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland et al
as 1:2017cv01988
Plaintiff:
Melinda Maldonado
Defendant:
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Amy S. Paulick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sweitzer v. McGuinn et al
as 1:2017cv01741
Plaintiff:
Philip J. Sweitzer
Defendant:
Colleen McGuinn, Dario J. Broccolino, State of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barkovic v. Attorney Grievance Commission et al
as 2:2017cv10281
Plaintiff:
Timothy Barkovic
Defendant:
Attorney Grievance Commission, Alan Gershel, Robert Edick and others
Nettles v. Michigan Supreme Court Clerk et al
as 1:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
Beverley R. Nettles
Defendant:
Michigan Supreme Court Clerk, Larry S. Royster, Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
