Cases 21 - 30 of 82
Cruz v. Rice et al
as 4:2020cv01130
Defendant:
Carl Allen Rice and Quality Transportation, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Cruz
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CRUZ et al v. ASPEN LANDSCAPING CONTRACTING, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv08546
Plaintiff:
EFRAIN MORALES, ANTONIO M. DA ROSA, WILFREDO SANCHEZ and others
Defendant:
EASTERN LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS, INC., MARIA FUENTES, ASPEN LANDSCAPING CONTRACTING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
CRUZ v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv00743
Plaintiff:
ANGEL CRUZ
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER CHRISTOPHER HULMES and PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICERS DOE 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRUZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv01859
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
ANGEL CRUZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GIBBS et al v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv03067
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BEAGLES, JAMES SMITH, OZZIE JENKINS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gibbs et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2019cv02040
Plaintiff:
Richard Beagles, James Smith, Ozzie Jenkins and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv01843
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
US v. Miguel Cruz-Polanco
as 19-4285
Defendant / Appellant:
MIGUEL ANGEL CRUZ-POLANCO, a/k/a Luis Hernandez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Miguel Cruz-Polanco
as 19-4194
Defendant / Appellant:
MIGUEL ANGEL CRUZ-POLANCO
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01107
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
