Cases 21 - 30 of 126,472
Martin v. USA Wireless At&T et al
as 3:2024cv01434
Plaintiff:
Robert Martin
Defendant:
USA Wireless AT&T, Pre-Sonus Corporation, Sennheiser Electronics Head Quarters and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Ragouzis v. Hamilton et al
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Edgar T. Ragouzis and Edgar Thomas Ragouzis
Defendant:
Jr. Richardo O. Hamilton, John and Jane Doe(s) and ABC Legal Entities
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Cleckler v. McClain et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Joshua Matthew Cleckler
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hulbert v. RNCC Mailroom Personnel et al
as 7:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Kyle Allen Hulbert
Defendant:
RNCC Mailroom Personnel, R. Hickman, J. Bateman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Drake v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Earl David Drake
Defendant:
T. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hast v. Wild Hawk Wild Life LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02368
Plaintiff:
Daniel T. Hast
Defendant:
Wild Hawk Wild Life LLC and Derrick Times
Celado v. Sorrell et al
as 9:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Jeurin Celado
Defendant:
K. Sorrell, Trim, T. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fogel v. Hall et al
as 7:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brian Fogel
Defendant:
Major T. Hall, Warden Jeffrey Artrip, Assistant Warden J.H. Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
