Cases 21 - 30 of 1,215
Ronald Emrit v. Sean Combs
as 24-1195
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
SEAN JOHN COMBS, a/k/a P. Diddy, BAD BOY ENTERTAINMENT and ATLANTIC RECORDS
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 3:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean P. Diddy Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 4:2024cv00110
Defendant:
Sean Combs, P Diddy, Bad Boy Entertainment and others
Petitioner:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ronald Emrit v. Sean Combs
as 24-1193
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
SEAN JOHN COMBS, a/k/a P. Diddy, BAD BOY ENTERTAINMENT and ATLANTIC RECORDS
Emrit v. Combs et al.
as 1:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean P. Diddy Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 2:2024cv00164
Defendant:
Sean Combs, P. Diddy, Bad Boy Entertainment and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Ronald Emrit v. Sean Combs, et al
as 24-1314
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
SEAN P DIDDY COMBS, BAD BOY ENTERTAINMENT and ATLANTIC RECORDS
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 2:2024cv02085
Defendant:
Sean Combs, P. Diddy, Bad Boy Entertainment and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 1:2024cv00129
Defendant:
Sean Combs, P. Diddy, Bad Boy Entertainment and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit and RESTRICTED FILER Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 2:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
