Cases 21 - 30 of 100
ADAMS v. GUNDY et al
as 5:2026cv05799
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE ADAMS
Defendant:
CHIMENE VAN GUNDY, OUTSTANDING REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS, INC., EVERFLOW WEALTH, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Grimes v. Williams, Sr., et al.
as 26-5819
Petitioner:
BENNETT GOLDING GRIMES
Respondent:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, SR., JEREMY BEAN and STATE OF NEVADA
Simmons v. Bennett Creek Animal Hospital
as 8:2026cv03532
Plaintiff:
Britiany Simmons
Defendant:
Bennett Creek Animal Hospital
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Bennett v. Federal Express Corporation
as 7:2026cv07723
Plaintiff:
Kelly Bennett
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Bennett v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv07724
Plaintiff:
Wayne Bennett
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
LLOYD v. FORZATO et al
as 5:2026cv06743
Plaintiff:
SUSAN LLOYD
Defendant:
NICOLE FORZATO, SARA GRAY, STEPHEN TRZCINSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bennett v. Guardian Life Insurance Company of America, The
as 0:2026cv03882
Plaintiff:
Jayson Bennett
Defendant:
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Bennett v. Hathaway Development, LLC et al
as 3:2026cv02293
Plaintiff:
Levoy Joseph Bennett
Defendant:
Hathaway Development, LLC, England-Thims & Miller, INC and Hathaway Construction Services, INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Bennett v. Lee
as 1:2026cv00152
Petitioner:
Erin Elisabeth Bennett
Respondent:
Aaron Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bennett v. Lee
as 1:2026cv00151
Petitioner:
Erin Elisabeth Bennett
Respondent:
Aaron Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
