Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Riddle v. Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation
as 6:2022cv01582
Plaintiff:
Danielle Riddle
Defendant:
Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1755
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Parker v. Carvana, LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Dianne K. Parker
Defendant:
Carvana, LLC and Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00972
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv05908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation v. Saddler
as 4:2021cv01096
Plaintiff:
Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation
Defendant:
Richard Saddler
3Rd Party Defendant:
Drive Time Automotive Group, Inc., SilverRock Group, Inc. and Carvana, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Breonnah Fitzpatrick v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2021cv06841
Plaintiff:
Breonnah Fitzpatrick, Christopher Officer and Timothy McCarty
Cross Defendant:
City of Los Angeles
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles Department of Transportion, Seleta Reynolds, Brian Alan Hale and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
James E Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv06392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
