Cases 21 - 30 of 74
Mudge, et al v. Bank of America
as 15-1559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN H. MUDGE, JR. and LISA S. MUDGE
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, INC.
Defendant:
TD BANK NA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00157
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Barimah v. Bank of America Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv03324
Plaintiff:
Mike Twum Barimah
Defendant:
Bank of America Inc. and Kwame Adofo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barrett v. Cranberry Financial et al
as 5:2014cv00330
Plaintiff:
Rachel Barrett
Defendant:
Cranberry Financial, Capital Crossing, Bank of America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
Verghese et al v. Bank of America, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00037
Plaintiff:
Thomson C. Verghese and Jane V. Thomson
Defendant:
Bank of America, Inc. , Federal National Home Loan Corporation and Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Emrit v. Bank of America Inc.
as 3:2013cv00547
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Bank of America Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Hammond v. McDonalds (Inc. or Corp.) et al
as 1:2013cv06112
Plaintiff:
Reginald Adae Hammond, II
Defendant:
McDonalds (Inc. or Corp.), University of Louisiville (U of L), Macy's Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Leonelli v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00368
Plaintiff:
John Leonelli
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Services, Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and Homeward Bank of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Aderibigbe v. Bank of America, Inc.
as 1:2013cv01175
Plaintiff:
Olusegun Aderibigbe
Defendant:
Bank of America, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
