Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 5,963
La Ronde-Bey v. Chica et al
as 3:2024cv00689
Plaintiff: Noble Lester Keith La Ronde-Bey
Defendant: Michael Chica, Rich P. White, Tyler Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Kaldes et al
as 1:2024cv00678
Plaintiff: Scottsdale Insurance Company
Defendant: George Kaldes, Photini Kaldes, Kaldes, Inc. doing business as Al's Cafe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Jason Amin-Bey v. USA
as 24-1649
Plaintiff: JASON L. AMIN-BEY
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Benton v. Cidambi et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv02968
Plaintiff: Carzell Benton and Hassan H. Bey
Defendant: Kumar Cidambi, Indra Cidambi and MEGHILA L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
El-Bey v. Ndze et al
as 1:2024cv01096
Plaintiff: Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant: Ndze, Farinloye and Boyd Cod
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BEY v. MCCRADY et al
as 2:2024cv00564
Plaintiff: ZAMA ELOAH BEY
Defendant: JENNIFER MCCRADY and ATTORNEY LISA VANQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Reed v. Commissioner United States Parole Commission, et al
as 24-1687
Plaintiff: ROBERT ANDREW REED, a/k/a Robert Andrew Bey
Defendant: COMMISSIONER UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and CHRISTOPHER WHITMER, U.S. Parole Examiner Employee
Gary El-BeyIn re: Gary El-Bey
as 24-10341
Petitioner: In re: Gary Dion Allen El-Bey
Bey v. Carter-Haston et al
as 3:2024cv00395
Plaintiff: Hanif Rahim Bey
Defendant: Carter-Haston, Brownlee Whitlow & Praet, L. Marc Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BEY v. FULLERTON et al
as 2:2024cv00584
Petitioner: ZAMA ELOAH BEY
Respondent: WILLIAM FULLERTON and PUBLIC SERVANT SCHULUCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?