Cases 21 - 30 of 30
United States v. Billy Walker
as 12-3419
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Billy Walker
Felix v. Holder
as 12-1143
Petitioner:
MARK FELIX, JR., a/k/a Benito Cadet, a/k/a Ronald Etheridge, a/k/a Thomas Griffin, a/k/a Kendall Jefferson, a/k/a Dameon Johnson, a/k/a Mark Johnson, a/k/a Troy Smith, a/k/a Troy William, a/k/a Brian Durate, a/k/a Michael Phillips, a/k/a Billy Walker, a/k
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Rose v. Utah State Bar, et al
as 11-4095
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUSAN ROSE
Defendant - Appellee:
UTAH STATE BAR, Office of Professional Conduct, BARBARA TOWNSEND, BILLY WALKER and others
Rose v. Utah State Bar, et al
as 10-4209
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUSAN ROSE
Defendant - Appellee:
UTAH STATE BAR, Office of Professional Conduct, BARBARA TOWNSEND, BILLY WALKER and others
Rose v. Utah State Bar et al
as 2:2010cv01001
Plaintiff:
Susan Rose
Defendant:
Utah State Bar, Barbara Townsend, Billie Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. State of Utah, et al
as 10-4000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUSAN ROSE
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF UTAH, UTAH STATE BAR, CAROLYN COX and others
Bennett et al v. Bayer AG et al
as 4:2008cv00106
Plaintiff:
Robert Bennett, Charles Bennett, Circle B Farms and others
Defendant:
Bayer AG, Bayer Cropscience AG, Bayer Bioscience NV and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Walker v. (LNU)
as 1:2008cv00093
Plaintiff:
Billy Walker
Defendant:
Abdul (LNU)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company et al v. Brooks et al
as 3:2007cv00868
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Billy Walker, Kelly Brooks, Joshua S. Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Walker v. City of Memphis Police Department
as 2:2007cv02322
Plaintiff:
Billy Walker
Defendant:
City of Memphis Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
