Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 212
Combs v. Bridgestone Americas, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00346
Plaintiff: Gary Dylan Combs
Defendant: Bridgestone Americas, Inc., Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC doing business as Tire Distribution Systems, Bridgestone Bandag, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00255
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
50-50, LLC v. Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC
as 1:2022cv00975
Defendant: Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC a Delaware limited liability company formerly known as Bridgestone/Firestone North American Tire, LLC doing business as Tire Distribution Systems and/or GCR Tires & Service and Bridgestone
Plaintiff: 50-50, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Real Property
Hobart Corporation et al v. The Dayton Power and Light Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00115
Cross Claimant: Pharmacia LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and Dayton Power and Light Company
Counter Claimant: Standard Register Company, Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations LLC, Valley Asphalt Corporation and others
Defendant: Dayton Industrial Drum, Inc., PPG Industries, Inc., Waste Management of Ohio, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant: United States Department of Defense, Sherwin-Williams Company, "John Doe" Corporation(s) and others
Counter Defendant: Harris Corporation, Franklin Iron & Metal Corp, City of Dayton, Ohio and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Ronald H. Barnett, Dryden Road Investments, LLC, South Dayton Land Fill Remediation Trust and others
Plaintiff: Hobart Corporation and Kelsey-Hayes Company doing business as ZF Active Safety US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
CARGILLE SONS et al v. BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS TIRE OPERATIONS, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01515
Plaintiff: CARGILLE SONS and CARGILLE-SACHER LABORATORIES, INC.
Defendant: BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS TIRE OPERATIONS, LLC and OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613 CERCLA
Gregory v. Harris et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00089
Plaintiff: Ashli Gregory
Defendant: Dorrell Harris, Skyway Logistics Corp. and Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC v. Speedways Tyres Limited et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00145
Plaintiff: Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC
Defendant: Speedways Tyres Limited, Speedways Rubber Co Limited, SWT Americas, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
James Laukat et al v. ABB, Inc., et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv09436
Defendant: DCo LLC, f/k/a and individually as successor in interest to Dana Companies LLC, Victor Corporation, Victor Gaskets and Victor Manufacturing and Gasket Company, OReilly Auto Enterprises, LLC f/k/a CSK Auto, Inc. individually and as successor in interest to Grand Auto, Inc. and Kragen Auto Parts, SPX Corporation, individually and as successor in interest to Bear Automotive Service Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff: Misun Laukat and James Laukat
Petitioner: National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
NLRB v. Bridgestone Americas Tire Ops
as 21-2681
Petitioner: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent: BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS TIRE OPERATIONS, LLC
Apex Transit, LLC v. Bridgestone Americas, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00053
Defendant: Bridgestone Americas, Inc., Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC and Bridgestone/Firestone North America Tire, LLC
Plaintiff: Apex Transit, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?