Cases 21 - 30 of 78
Joseph Pitts v. Piliopo Tuitama, et al
as 18-15656
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH PITTS
Defendant - Appellee:
PILIOPO TUITAMA, Sergeant , sued in individual and official capacities, JODIE MAESAKA-HIRATA, sued in her individual and official capacities, NOLAN P. ESPINDA, Warden, sued in his individual and official capacities and others
Mack v. Ricketts et al
as 8:2017cv00495
Defendant:
Dr. Stephanie Bruhn, Wayne Chandlier, Rosalyn Cotton and others
Plaintiff:
Nathanial Gerald Serrell Mack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muller et al v. Bruhn
as 3:2017cv00532
Plaintiff:
Richard Carl Muller and EDC Tactical, LLC
Defendant:
Evan John Bruhn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pitts v. Tuitama et al
as 1:2017cv00137
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pitts
Defendant:
Tuitama, Jodie Maesaka-Hirata, Nolan Espinda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2sx Job Discrimination (Sex)
Jordan v. Raptor Pharmaceutical Corp. et al
as 1:2016cv00913
Plaintiff:
Jesse Jordan
Defendant:
Raptor Pharmaceutical Corp. , Julie Anne Smith , Christopher M. Starr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lavrenov v. Raptor Pharmaceutical Corp. et al
as 1:2016cv00901
Plaintiff:
Roman Lavrenov
Defendant:
Raptor Pharmaceutical Corp. , Misneach Corporation, Horizon Pharma plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BRUHN-POPIK v. MABUS et al
as 1:2016cv01548
Plaintiff:
MARIANNE BRUHN-POPIK
Defendant:
RAY MABUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Kosiski v. Frakes et al
as 8:2016cv00345
Defendant:
All John and Jane Does known and Unknown, Unknown Armkneckt, Teresa Bittinger and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Kosiski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRUHN NEWTECH, INC. v. USA
as 1:2016cv00783
Plaintiff:
BRUHN NEWTECH, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
