Cases 21 - 30 of 852
Moore et al v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv01388
Plaintiff:
Brittany C Moore, Ausar Moore, Brittany C. Moore and others
Defendant:
Sheriff Mike Williams, Alejandro Carmona-Fonseca, Christopher Padgett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Genaro Carmona-Garcia v. U.S. Attorney General
as 23-13817
Petitioner:
GENARO ANTONIO CARMONA-GARCIA
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
CARMONA v. MORENO
as 1:2023cv00967
Plaintiff:
MARCOS GRANADOS CARMONA
Defendant:
NATHALIE AYARY NAVA MORENO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Strickland v. Cusick et al
as 2:2023cv12688
Plaintiff:
Marco Strickland
Defendant:
Paul J. Cusick, John T. Courtright, Mark W. Bernardi and others
ISHAK v. GREENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv03151
Plaintiff:
AKUA ISHAK
Defendant:
GREENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, LEE CARMONA, CEDRIC BURRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Carmona v. Bard Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03453
Plaintiff:
Celia Carmona
Defendant:
Bard Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PARADISE ADVENTURES LLC v. JACKSON-CARMONA
as 4:2023cv00450
Plaintiff:
Paradise Adventures, LLC and PARADISE ADVENTURES LLC
Defendant:
shondrial jackson-carmona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Gregory Echols et al v. Department Of Homeland Security et al
as 5:2023cv02088
Plaintiff:
Gregory Echols and Jeannie Echols
Defendant:
Luis Gerardo Carmona, Jr., Department of Homeland Security and Does 1 to 100 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
