Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Hammond v. Stob, et al
as 16-1086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD ZACHARY HAMMOND
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. PETER CRUM, M.D., DR. STOB, CAROL ROGERS, Health Care Admin and others
Hammond v. Stob et al
as 1:2016cv00069
Plaintiff:
Gerald Zachary Hammond
Defendant:
Stob, Carol Rogers, Koonce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv12656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Rogers v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv07942
Plaintiff:
Bettina Carol Rogers
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rogers-Cannon et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00775
Plaintiff:
Carol Rogers-Cannon and Vincent Cannon
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROGERS v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv74509
Plaintiff:
CAROL ROGERS and CAROL ROGERS
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, OWENS-ILLINOIS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ROGERS et al v. PITTSBURGH-CORNING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv67640
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND P. ROGERS and CAROL ROGERS
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH-CORNING CORPORATION, FIBREBOARD CORPORATION, THE CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Ward v. Cribb et al
as 4:2007cv01039
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Rocky Ward
Defendant:
A Lane Cribb, Barry Marsh, Michael Swartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Steed v. Morton et al
as 4:2007cv00830
Plaintiff:
Robert C Steed
Defendant:
Major Morton, Major Morton, Captain Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
