Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Anderton et al v. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department et al
as 3:2013cv01641
Defendant:
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Texas Animal Health Commission, Carter Smith and others
Plaintiff:
James Anderton and Jimmie Anderton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lewis et al v. Ceralvo Holdings, LLC et al
as 4:2011cv00055
Plaintiff:
Ruth Jean Lewis , Barbara Robison , Robert W. Robison and others
Defendant:
Ceralvo Holdings, LLC and Armstrong Coal Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Powell v. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department et al
as 2:2011cv00239
Defendant:
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Carter Smith, Clayton Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv01033
Plaintiff:
Raymond Carter Smith
Defendant:
Matrixx Initiatives Incorporated , Botanical Laboratories Incorporated and Zicam LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv04075
Plaintiff:
Raymond Carter Smith
Defendant:
Matrixx Initiatives, Inc., Zicam, LLC and Botanical Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cavallo et al v. Glazer et al
as 3:2009cv01613
Plaintiff:
Guilio Cavallo and Carmela Fraioli-Cavallo
Defendant:
Thomas Patrick Dore, Jr., Thomas Patrick Dore, Jr., Geoff Haydock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
USA v. Chrystalin Carter
as 09-1103
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRYSTALIN CARTER, aka Chrystalin Carter-Smith
Cavallo et al v. Glazer et al
as 7:2009cv00429
Plaintiff:
Giulio Cavallo and Carmela Fraioli-Cavallo
Defendant:
Dennis E. Glazer, Thomas Patrick Dore, Jr., Geoff Haydock and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
