Cases 21 - 30 of 39
JONES v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv01876
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE JONES
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JONES v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as PAE/2:12-cv-01876
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE JONES
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 3
Baum et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00607
Plaintiff:
Larry Baum, Eunice Boutte, Charmaine Fontenot and others
Defendant:
John Does 1 through 3 and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Crespo v. Watkins et al
as 1:2010cv00119
Plaintiff:
Mauris Crespo
Defendant:
Sandra Watkins, Marty Hamm, Frank Heroux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bethel et al v. Mack et al
as 1:2010cv00656
Plaintiff:
Orlando Bethel and Glynis Bethel
Defendant:
Huey Alfred Mack, Jr., Charlie Jones, Baldwin County, Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Young
as 2:2010cv01682
Petitioner:
Charlie Jones, III
Respondent:
Joseph Peter Young, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OLIVER v. DOW et al
as 2:2010cv01542
Defendant:
PAULA T. DOW, MERRILLL MAIN, PhD., JENNIFER VELEZ and others
Plaintiff:
LORENZO OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
BARNES v. ROSS et al
as 2:2009cv02489
Plaintiff:
TYRONE BARNES
Defendant:
YOLETTE ROSS, OSCAR DOYLE, PETER JAMES VAN ETTEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
