Cases 21 - 30 of 923
Collins v. Palmer et al
as 2:2023cv05273
Plaintiff:
Robbie Collins
Defendant:
John Palmer, Major, Hefner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv14756
Plaintiff:
Darvell D Davis
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Peterson and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forster v. Krasnoff et al
as 1:2023cv01361
Plaintiff:
Tommie Forster and Tommie Matthias El
Defendant:
Alan P. Krasnoff, Clint D. Davis, Harold W. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv02174
Plaintiff:
DEWAYNE D. DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sheffield v. Food Service Director et al
as 3:2023cv01051
Plaintiff:
Andre L. Sheffield
Defendant:
Food Service Director, Colonel Handley, Captain Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard Davis v. Michael Meisner
as 23-2745
Petitioner / Appellant:
HOWARD D. DAVIS
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL MEISNER, Warden
KELLER v. ALLISON et al
as 3:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. KELLER
Defendant:
GARY ALLISON, TOMMI HAMILTON, RUSSELL CONRAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Bettinger et al
as 4:2023cv04125
Petitioner:
Deaver D. Davis
Respondent:
Warden Teresa Bettinger and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert D Davis v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv04160
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Robert D Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Davis v. Maher et al
as 3:2023cv04147
Plaintiff:
Astarte Davis
Defendant:
Joan Maher, Loyal D. Davis, Betty Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
