Cases 21 - 30 of 69
Kayla Belt, et al v. Jean Abel, et al
as 20-1237
Defendant / Appellee:
BRET COPELAND, JEAN ABEL, MARGARET DREES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAN D. CROSS and KAYLA R. BELT
RiverCity Properties, LLC et al v. The City of Belpre, Ohio et al
as 2:2020cv00530
Plaintiff:
RiverCity Properties, LLC and Ron Eddy Builders, Ltd.
Defendant:
Safety-Service Dir. Ronald D. Cross and The City of Belpre, Ohio
Not Classified By Court:
Peter K Newman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belt et al v. Abel et al
as 2:2019cv01899
Defendant:
Tiffany Hall, Bret Copeland, Jean Abel and others
Plaintiff:
Kayla R Belt and Sean D Cross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris et al v. German Township, Ohio et al
as 3:2019cv00341
Defendant:
German Township, Ohio, Valorie A. Hill, Jacob C. Stubbs and others
Plaintiff:
Neal Harris and Joy Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CROSS v. GRIFFIN
as 3:2019cv00068
Defendant:
SABRIYA GRIFFIN and Cheven Bernard King, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Darrell D. Cross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CROSS v. GRIFFIN
as 5:2019cv00328
Defendant:
SABRIYA GRIFFIN
Plaintiff:
DARRELL D CROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ewer v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2019cv00370
Defendant:
A D Cross, Paul Petropoulos, Pima, County of and others
Plaintiff:
Skyler Ewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Darrell Cross v. GDOC Centural Banking Inc. of, et al
as 19-12412
Defendant / Appellee:
GDOC CENTURAL BANKING INC. OF ATLANTA, GA., FORSYTH, GA DIVISION CLERKS, Acct; South GA GDOC, SABNIYA GRIFFIN, Clerk and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRELL D. CROSS and DARRELL DEMETRIUS CROSS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01382
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr
Lewis, Antonio v. Cross, Troy
as 3:2019cv00228
Defendant:
Troy D. Cross
Plaintiff:
Antonio D. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
