Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Pines v. Cruz
as 3:2015cv01368
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Pines
Defendant:
Narcisco D. Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaither v. Cruz et al
as 2:2015cv00104
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Gaither
Defendant:
Gregory S David, Ray D Cruz, Gene W Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRUZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2015cv01837
Plaintiff:
CARLOS D. CRUZ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gaines v. Cruz
as 2:2014cv14357
Petitioner:
John E. Gaines
Respondent:
Michael D. Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Slemp v. CACH, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00243
Plaintiff:
Darlene Slemp
Defendant:
CACH, LLC , Edna D Cruz and Buffaloe & Associates, PLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cruz-Barrios v. Cooperativa de Farmacia Santa Teresita
as 3:2013cv01306
Plaintiff:
Lucy D Cruz-Barrios
Defendant:
Cooperativa de Farmacia Santa Teresita
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Pope v. Cach LCC et al
as 2:2013cv00016
Plaintiff:
Billy R Pope
Defendant:
Cach LCC, Buffaloe & Associates, PLC and Edna D Cruz
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Trustees of the Texas Carpenters and Millwrights Health & Welfare Fund et al v. Cruz et al
as 4:2011cv03554
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Texas Carpenters and Millwrights Health & Welfare Fund , Trustees of the Carpenters Labor-Management Pension Fund , Trustees of the Texas Carpenters and Millwrights Apprenticeship Training Fund and others
Defendant:
John D Cruz and Cruz Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Cruz v. The City of New York
as 1:2011cv04207
Plaintiff:
Edwin D. Cruz
Defendant:
The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cruz-Rodriguez v. US
as 11-1976
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARLOS D. CRUZ-RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a Carlos Cuajo, a/k/a Carlitos Way
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
EDGAR R. VEGA PABON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
