Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Cunningham v. Park Lane Digital Media et al
as 3:2015cv00467
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Park Lane Digital Media, Ardalan Afshar, Ian Greenfield and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Lynch et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 7:2014cv02268
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Danielle Lynch , Natalie Best , Mandy Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lynch v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv10656
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lynch
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Lynch et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 3:2013cv05276
Defendant:
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Danielle Lynch , Natalie Best , Mandy Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McKinney v. Lawrence et al
as 3:2012cv01224
Plaintiff:
William J. McKinney, Jr.
Defendant:
Bernard Lawrence, Daniel Lynch, Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lon Brown v. Daniel Lynch, et al
as 12-30042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LON BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL LYNCH, HENRY WHITEHORN, SR. and CITY OF SHREVEPORT
LYNCH et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv62884
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LYNCH and ROSE LYNCH
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, EAGLE PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lynch et al v. The City of New York
as 1:2010cv07034
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lynch and Cheryl Lynch
Defendant:
The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101
Lynch v. Miller et al
as 3:2010cv00848
Plaintiff:
Dale J. Lynch
Defendant:
Pete Miller, Kimberley Miller, Kim Spilker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynch v. Miller et al
as 3:2010mc00103
Plaintiff:
Dale J. Lynch
Defendant:
Pete Miller, Kimberley Miller, Kim Spilker and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
