Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Wade et al v. Churyk We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00609
Plaintiff: Daniel Wade and Sally Wade
Defendant: Boris Churyk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fredrick Norwood, et al v. City of Mendenhall, MS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-60229
Plaintiff - Appellant: FREDRICK NORWOOD, VIRGINIA MCLAUREN and DANIELLE WADE
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF MENDENHALL, MISSISSIPPI, DONALD BRUCE BARLOW and CLAY HOLLOWELL
Daniel Wilson v. David Sexton
as 14-5570
Petitioner - Appellant: DANIEL WADE WILSON
Respondent - Appellee: DAVID SEXTON, Warden
Daniel Landrith v. Laura Escapule
as 14-70971
Petitioner: DANIEL WADE LANDRITH
Respondent: LAURA ESCAPULE
Norwood et al v. City of Mendenhall, Mississippi et al
as 3:2013cv00580
Plaintiff: Fredrick Norwood , Virginia McLauren and Danielle Wade
Defendant: City of Mendenhall, Mississippi, Donald Bruce Barlow, Clay Hollowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Sexton
as 2:2012cv00477
Petitioner: Daniel Wade Wilson
Respondent: David Sexton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02675
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Burleson v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv05063
Plaintiff: Daniel Wade Burleson
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Coots v. City of Kemah, Texas et al
as 4:2010cv05157
Plaintiff: Daniel Wade Coots
Defendant: City of Kemah, Texas , T. Wayne Lockett and Richard Burgess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Coots v. City of Kemah et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00003
Plaintiff: Daniel Wade Coots
Defendant: City of Kemah , T. Wayne Lockett and Richard Burgess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?