Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Woods v. The United States of America
as 3:2017cv00429
Plaintiff:
Donna Woods
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Woods v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2016cv00450
Plaintiff:
Donna Woods
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Woods v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv25844
Plaintiff:
Donna Woods
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Woods et al v. Town of Danville, West Virginia et al
as 2:2009cv00366
Plaintiff:
Donna Woods, Harold Gray Woods and Andrew Lee Adkins
Defendant:
Town of Danville, West Virginia, Town of Danville, West Virginia, Arthur Jarrett and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davis et al v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 0:2007cv00489
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis, Robert Davis, Robert Davis and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
The Sly James Firm Trial Lawyers, P.C. et al v. Challenge Financial Investors Corporation
as 4:2007cv00005
Plaintiff:
The Sly James Firm Trial Lawyers, P.C., The Sly James Firm Trial Lawyers, P.C. and Donna Woods
Defendant:
Challenge Financial Investors Corporation
Third Party Defendant:
EZPMG, INC., Eazy Financial Group, Inc. and Kenneth B. Elias
Third Party Plaintiff:
Challenge Financial Investors Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
