Cases 21 - 30 of 94
Darryl Johnson v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
as 19-13689
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARRYL JOHNSON
Johnson v. Artis et al
as 2:2019cv11961
Defendant:
O'Connell, May, Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl Johnson
Johnson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv05962
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Darryl Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Bauman
as 2:2018cv12433
Petitioner:
Darryl Johnson
Respondent:
Catherine S. Bauman
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Johnson #561762 v. Bauman
as 2:2018cv00128
Petitioner:
Darryl Johnson #561762
Respondent:
Catherine S. Bauman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Secretary Department of Corrections et al (Pinellas)
as 8:2018cv01434
Petitioner:
Darryl Johnson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Christopher Dickinson v. Warren Brown, et al
as 18-35024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER DICKINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WARREN BROWN, in his official capacity as President of North Seattle College and DARRYL JOHNSON, individually and in his official capacity as Director of Safety and Security for North Seattle College
Johnson v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv06561
Plaintiff:
Darryl Johnson
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United States of America v. Green (Johnson)
as 17-2424
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Donald Green, AKA Sly, AKA Stone, Norman Workman, AKA Norm, AKA Tony, Clayton Green, AKA Iceberg and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Darryl Johnson, AKA Reese
Richard Dunsmore v. Scott Burroughs, et al
as 17-40683
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD A. DUNSMORE
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT BURROUGHS, MUNICIPALITY OF THE CITY OF PORT ARANSAS (TEXAS) and INVESTIGATOR DARRYL JOHNSON, The City of Port Aransas Police Department
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
