Cases 21 - 30 of 1,832
motley v. JaNae Rocquel Motley Estate et al et al
as 1:2023cv10268
Plaintiff:
janae rocquel motley
Defendant:
JaNae Rocquel Motley Estate et al, Dymarion Rashad Brooks Estate et al, Derrion Rashad Brooks Estate et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harbin v. Hines et al
as 4:2023cv00215
Petitioner:
David Lee Harbin
Respondent:
Hon. Ashley Hines and Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paynter et al v. Progress Software Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv12524
Plaintiff:
Judy Paynter, Keith Sennefelder and David Lee Pratt
Defendant:
Progress Software Corporation and Arietis Health, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
United States of America v. Kennedy
as 23-2951
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID LEE KENNEDY, JR.
Star v. Doe
as 2:2023cv00157
Plaintiff:
David Lee Star
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LEE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv28783
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
IN RE: MOVEit Customer Data Security Breach Litigation
as 1:2023md03083
Plaintiff:
Shavonne Diggs, Brady Bradberry, Christina Bradberry and others
Defendant:
Progress Software Corporation, Maximus Federal Services, Inc., The Berwyn Group, Inc. and others
LEE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv19468
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GENTRY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13634
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE GENTRY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
