Cases 21 - 30 of 70
M.A.R. et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2021cv02957
Defendant:
Unknown Doe Officer 4, Police Chief Michel Moore, Does 5-10, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Silvia Imelda Rivera, M. A. R. and Elisabeth Barragan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. DeLong et al
as 1:2021cv01065
Defendant:
Cheryl Hansen, Wesley Young, Kyle DeLong and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bush et al v. Orozco et al
as 1:2020cv06833
Defendant:
Adolfo Bolanos, John Doe Officer #3, Carolina Orozco and others
Plaintiff:
Demond Bush and Sean Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLIVER v. NJ D.O.C CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION et al
as 2:2020cv14941
Plaintiff:
QUINCY OLIVER
Defendant:
JOHN DOE OFFICER 1, JOHN DOE OFFICER 2 and NJ D.O.C CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ordonez v. Doe Superintendent et al
as 6:2020cv06580
Defendant:
John Doe Superintendent and John Doe Officers #2-5
Petitioner:
Joseph Ordonez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingall v. Rabago, et al.
as 1:2020cv00306
Defendant:
Doe Defendants 1-10, Doe Corporations 1-5, Doe Entities 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel B Ingall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Romando v. City Of Naperville et al
as 1:2020cv02701
Defendant:
John Doe Officer #2, City Of Naperville, N. Desmond and others
Plaintiff:
Merry Romando
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lofton v. Cook County John Doe Officer 1 et al
as 1:2020cv01693
Defendant:
Cook County John Doe Officer 2, John Doe, Cook County John Doe Officer 4 and others
Plaintiff:
Orlando Lofton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendoza v. City of San Diego et al
as 3:2020cv00357
Plaintiff:
George Vallejos Mendoza
Defendant:
Does 3-10, Doe Officer Smith, Doe Officer 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Espigh v. Borough of Lewistown et al
as 1:2019cv02221
Defendant:
John Doe Officer 3, John Doe Officer 2, David K. Clemens and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Ryan Espigh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
