Cases 21 - 30 of 66
Taylor-Robinson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv15058
Plaintiff:
Debra Taylor-Robinson and Donald Robinson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KINARD et al v. EAST CAPITOL FAMILY RENTAL, L.P. et al
as 1:2015cv01935
Defendant:
EAST CAPITOL FAMILY RENTAL, L.P. , A&R MANAGEMENT, INC. and KETTLER MANAGEMENT, INC.
Plaintiff:
MILDRED KINARD , EARLENE WHEELER , VICKY BORDEAUX and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robinson v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00395
Plaintiff:
Donald Robinson
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richards v. Robinson et al
as 3:2014cv04234
Plaintiff:
Paul Lewis Richards
Defendant:
Donald Robinson and Stephen Dauway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv03250
Plaintiff:
Donald Robinson
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson Inc and Johnson & Johnson Services Inc
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv24622
Plaintiff:
Ruth Ann Robinson and Donald Robinson
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv16339
Plaintiff:
Carmen Robinson and Donald Robinson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv00901
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Donald Robinson, Jr. v. Mike McDonald
as 13-56767
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD ROBINSON, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
MIKE MCDONALD
Dawn Atwell, et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 13-8031
Respondent:
Dawn Atwell, Robert Atwell, Carol Dunn and others
Petitioner:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
