Cases 21 - 30 of 174
Flaugher v. State of Missouri
as 4:2022cv00827
Petitioner:
Douglas William Flaugher
Respondent:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hall v. Minto Development Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv06770
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hall
Defendant:
Minto Development Corporation, Benhti Economic Development Corporation, Douglas William Isaacson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv12024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
CALLAWAY v. WILLIAMS
as 3:2022cv00113
Petitioner:
MAURICE CALLAWAY and PRINCESS CALLAWAY
Respondent:
WARDEN DOUGLAS WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Williams
as 3:2022cv00173
Plaintiff:
Kentavius Evans
Defendant:
Warden Douglas Williams Wheeler and Douglas Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Williams
as 3:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Kentavius Evans
Defendant:
Wheeler Correctional Facility, Warden Douglas Williams and Douglas Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SICA v. MINTO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv06480
Plaintiff:
BRENDEN SICA
Defendant:
MINTO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, MINTO FINANCIAL D/B/A MINTO MONEY, BENHTI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Evans v. Williams
as 1:2022cv04388
Plaintiff:
Kentavius Evans
Defendant:
Warden Douglas Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Wheeler Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2022cv04386
Plaintiff:
Kentavius Evans
Defendant:
Wheeler Correctional Facility and Warden Douglas Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
