Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Green v. Department of Corrections
as 0:2017cv61114
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dwayne Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Patrick Greene
as 14-15311
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PATRICK DWAYNE GREENE
Eugene Green v. A. Padula
as 13-6969
Petitioner - Appellant:
EUGENE DWAYNE GREEN, a/k/a Eugene D. Green
Respondent - Appellee:
A. J. PADULA, Warden, Lee Correctional Institution
Frank Brett v. Dwayne Greene, et al
as 12-4474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant - Appellee:
DWAYNE GREENE, DAVID DODGE, RICHARD GERTZ and others
Greene v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 2:2012cv13014
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Greene
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
BRETT v. GREENE et al
as 2:2012cv03589
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
DWAYNE GREENE, RICHARD + MARION + RICHY+ CAROLINE GERTZ FAMILY and DAVID DODGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Cook, III v. Raymond Howard
as 11-1601
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN COOK, III, Individually, and as Adminstrator for the Estate of John Gideon Cook, IV, PATRICIA COOK, LINDA HAMMOND, parent and Guardian Ad Litem for Minor J.A.C. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND A. HOWARD, P/O (ID#C646) and DWAYNE GREEN, P/O (ID#G716)
Defendant:
BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF BALTIMORE, FREDERICK H. BEALEFELD, Commissioner, Baltimore City Police Department and others
Jackson v. St. Lawrence et al
as 4:2010cv00291
Plaintiff:
Yusef L. Jackson, Demetrius D. Banks, Demicus McCall and others
Defendant:
Al St. Lawrence, McAuthur Holmes, L. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roderick Dwayne Greene v. Kathleen Prosper
as 2:2008cv03249
Petitioner:
Roderick Dwayne Greene
Respondent:
Kathleen Prosper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
