Cases 21 - 30 of 100
Paul Thompson, Jr. v. H. Clarke
as 20-6529
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT D. WELLS
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT HARLEY COLNA, CORRECTIONS OFFICER FELTS, LIEUTENANT EVANS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL CLEVELAND THOMPSON, JR.
Micke v. Missouri State Highway Patrol et al
as 4:2020cv00954
Defendant:
Matthew Becker, Franklin County Sheriff's Department, Missouri State Highway Patrol and others
Plaintiff:
Scott M. Micke and Scott M. Arnold Micke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv15421
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KRIS E. PARKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Hammler v. State of California et al
as 2:2020cv00884
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, M. Gamboa, Pleshchuk and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Hammler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00511
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Parks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv64794
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KRIS E PARKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Smith v. Diaz, et al.
as 1:2020cv00349
Defendant:
D. Clark, M. Lirones, E. Rollins and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Christopher Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Diaz et al
as 4:2020cv01557
Defendant:
D. Clark, M. Lirones, E. Rollins and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Christopher Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sekosan v. A Bronx Women's Medical Pavilion, P.C. et al
as 1:2019cv11313
Plaintiff:
Marjana Sekosan
Defendant:
Brian E. Park, M.D. and A Bronx Women's Medical Pavilion, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Ozelia Hicks, Jr. v. James Parks
as 19-7465
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OZELIA HICKS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES E. PARKS, Offender Management Services Director
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
