Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Goodrum v. Robinson et al
as 5:2009cv00343
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wayne Goodrum, Sr
Defendant:
Gerald Robinson, Ronnie Cole, Ed Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Livingston v. Adams et al
as 5:2009cv00227
Plaintiff:
Marvin Livingston
Defendant:
Ed Adams, Hunter, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Robinson et al
as 5:2009cv00197
Plaintiff:
Arnice Rogers and Arnice Rogers
Defendant:
Gerald Robinson, Ed Adams, Cleon Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Hicks et al v. Robinson et al
as 5:2009cv00161
Plaintiff:
Hardy Hicks and Lu'vell Livingston, II
Defendant:
Gerald Robinson, Ronnie Cole, Tyra Tyler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brazell v. Robinson et al
as 5:2009cv00059
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Brazell
Defendant:
Gerald Robinson, Ronnie Cole, Tyra Tyler and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Young et al v. Hurst et al
as 5:2009cv00027
Plaintiff:
Guy B Young, Mark Glover, Clifford Chambers and others
Defendant:
Mike Hurst, Ed Adams, Robert Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sebourn v. Jackson et al
as 5:2009cv00028
Plaintiff:
Michael Sebourn
Defendant:
Robert Jackson, Ed Adams, King and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nowden et al v. Robinson et al
as 5:2009cv00021
Plaintiff:
Jermyn Nowden, John T Colbert and Christopher A Ajayi, Jr
Defendant:
Gerald Robinson, Cole, Ed Adams and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Livingston et al v. Robinson et al
as 5:2008cv00330
Plaintiff:
Lu'vell Livingston, II, Kevin Payton and Molton Oglesby
Defendant:
Gerald Robinson, Tyra Tyler and Ed Adams
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Moore v. Rushing et al
as 5:2008cv00326
Plaintiff:
Jameel Anwar Moore
Defendant:
Rushing, Ed Adams and Kamp
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
