Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv02316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hamilton v. Smith
as 10-2964
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Derrick Hamilton
Defendant - Appellee:
J.T. Smith, Superintendent, Shawangunk Correctional Facility, J. Maly, Deputy Superintendent of Security, William M. Gonzalez, Deputy Counsel and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00343
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lexington Insurance Company v. Carolina Springs Academy et al
as 8:2008cv00892
Plaintiff:
Lexington Insurance Company and Lexington Insurance Company
Defendant:
Carolina Springs Academy, Narvin Litchfield and Elaine Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
DAVIS et al v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2007cv01749
Plaintiff:
CARL ROGER DAVIS and JO ELAINE DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Davis et al v. United States Government, The et al
as 6:2007cv03039
Plaintiff:
Carl Roger Davis and Jo Elaine Davis
Defendant:
United States Government, The, Department of the Treasury and Internal Revenue Service Oversight Board
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
