Cases 21 - 30 of 56
POOLE v. HARVEY
as 1:2007cv01320
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. POOLE
Defendant:
FRANCIS J. HARVEY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv05032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jones v. Harvey
as 1:2007cv00345
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jones
Defendant:
Francis J. Harvey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 07-30395
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 07-50257
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CURRY v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv00199
Plaintiff:
BOBBY RAY CURRY, JR.
Defendant:
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, HARLEY LAPPIN and FRANCIS J. HARVEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Watson v. Harvey
as 1:2007cv00345
Petitioner:
Timothy D. Watson
Respondent:
Francis J. Harvey and Francis J. Harvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
State of Missouri v. United States Army Corps of En, et al
as 07-1149
:
In re: Operation of the Missouri River System Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellant:
State of Missouri, ex rel Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Francis J. Harvey, Secretary of the Army, United States Department of Defense and Brigadier General Gregg F. Martin
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
