Cases 21 - 30 of 52
GARDNER, JR. v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al
as 3:2017cv07747
Plaintiff:
EDWARD G. GARDNER, JR.
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Polizzi et al
as 9:2017cv00377
Plaintiff:
William D. Thomas
Defendant:
Polizzi, Louis Pingotti, Jamie M. LaManna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Pingotti et al
as 9:2017cv00300
Plaintiff:
William A. Thomas
Defendant:
L. Pingotti, G. Gardner, J. Taylor-Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bussey v. Miller et al
as 1:2016cv00082
Plaintiff:
Jewell A. Bussey
Defendant:
T. Miller, K. Gignor, G. Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00819
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Gardner v. Wilkins, et al
as 14-4090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDSON G. GARDNER, Uintah Indian Descendant
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL W. WILKINS, Uintah County Clerk-Auditor and G.A. PETRY, Uintah County Justice Court Judge
Gardner, et al v. Arrowchis, et al
as 13-4122
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDSON G. GARDNER, Uintag Indian Descendent and LYNDA M. KOZLOWICZ
Respondent - Appellee:
TEX ARROWICHIS, Ute Tribal Chief, UTE INDIAN TRIBAL BUSINESS COMMITTEE and UTE TRIBAL COURT
Kozlowicz, et al v. Salazar
as 13-4095
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LYNDA M. KOZLOWICZ, EDSON G. GARDNER, MELVIN JENKINS, SR. and others
Respondent - Appellee:
KENNETH L. SALAZAR, U.S. Secretary of the Interior
Shields et al v. Gardner
as 3:2013cv08074
Plaintiff:
Richard Shields and Bess Shields
Defendant:
William G Gardner, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Baker et al
as 1:2012cv04173
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
Dan R. Baker, Ralph N. Barber, Jr., Ralph N. Barber, Sr. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
