Cases 21 - 30 of 66
RAMOS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv24702
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANGEL G RAMOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramos v. Barr
as 19-9549
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
JOSE G. RAMOS
Samuel Love v. Rodolfo G. Ramos et al
as 5:2018cv00951
Defendant:
DOES, Consuelo S. Ramos and Rodolfo G. Ramos
Plaintiff:
Samuel Love
Aloysius P. Franklin v. G. Ramos
as 2:2018cv02093
Plaintiff:
Aloysius P. Franklin
Defendant:
G. Ramos
Moore v. Neel et al
as 3:2017cv00503
Plaintiff:
John Moore, III
Defendant:
C. Neel, Marteney, Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. NEEL et al
as 4:2017cv00192
Plaintiff:
JOHN MOORE, III
Defendant:
C NEEL, SPENCER, MARTENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. FORNES et al
as 4:2017cv00086
Plaintiff:
ADELL EDWARD WILLIAMS
Defendant:
R FORNES, G RAMOS and JULIE JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. Rodham Clinton et al
as 1:2016cv10408
Plaintiff:
Sandra Ann Chambers
Defendant:
Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton, Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation, Timothy Tim Kaine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Ramos v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv08433
Plaintiff:
Maria G. Ramos
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated and Cook Biotech, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amer Acdmy of Implant Dentry, et al v. Glenn Parker, et al
as 16-50161
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, AMERICAN SOCIETY OF DENTIST ANESTHESIOLOGISTS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORAL MEDICINE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
GLENN PARKER, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Texas State Board of Dental Examiners, TAMELA L. GOUGH, D. D. S., M. S., in her official capacity as a Member of the Texas Board of Dental Examiners, STEVE AUSTIN, D. D. S., in his official capacity as a Member of the Texas Board of Dental Examiners and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
