Cases 21 - 30 of 2,799
Guzman Vela v. Medeles et al
as 1:2024at00335
Plaintiff:
Daniel Guzman Vela
Defendant:
Rey Medeles, Gustavo Gutierrez, Unknown Law Enforcement Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alvarez v. Newsome
as 4:2024cv02306
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Alvarez
Defendant:
Newsome
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michelle Bustamante v. County of Riverside et al
as 8:2024cv00856
Plaintiff:
Michelle Bustamante
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Sheriff Chad Bianco, Sheriff Officer Gustavo Ibarra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. GG's Cocos Locos, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
GG's Cocos Locos, LLC d/b/a Fillmore's and d/b/a Fillmore's Bar & Grill, Claudia E. Lomas and Gustavo A. Lomas, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gustavo Velez-Hernandez v. District Attorney Lehigh County, et al
as 24-1642
Plaintiff:
GUSTAVO D. VELEZ-HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY, SUPERINTENDENT WAYMART SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Santander v. Salazar
as 24-10275
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Santander
Defendant:
Jose Salazar and FW SS Holdings, L.L.C.
Lopez et al v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv00628
Plaintiff:
Julia Lopez, Gustavo Elizondo and Mary Iman
Defendant:
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, North Las Vegas Police Department and City of North Las Vegas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tustin Village MHP Associates, LP v. Alvarez et al
as 8:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
Tustin Village MHP Associates, LP doing business as Tustin Village Mobile Home Park
Defendant:
Gustavo Alvarez, Julio C. Franco and Does 1 to 5 Inclusive
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
