Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Doss v. Cox et al
as 1:2014cv00367
Plaintiff:
LaTaursha Andrews Doss
Defendant:
William H Cox, David W Denny, Clarence Shattuck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monty Bell v. Ron Littlefield, et al
as 14-5964
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTY DEWAYNE BELL
Defendant - Appellee:
RON LITTLEFIELD, Mayor of Chattanooga, WALTER F. WILLIAMS, Former City Court Judge, DON POOLE, County of Hamilton, Tennessee, Criminal Court Judge, Division III and others
Ortiz v. The City of Greenville et al
as 4:2013cv00168
Plaintiff:
Jose Julio Ortiz
Defendant:
The City of Greenville , Greenville Police Department , John H. Cox, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bell v. Littlefield et al
as 1:2013cv00043
Plaintiff:
Monty Dewayne Bell
Defendant:
Ron Littlefield, Walter F Williams, Don Poole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
James H Cox et al v. Wells Fargo Bank N A et al
as 2:2012cv07435
Plaintiff:
Connie Cox and James H Cox, III
Defendant:
Does and Wells Fargo Bank N A
Backpage.com, LLC v. Cooper et al
as 3:2012cv00654
Plaintiff:
Backpage.com, LLC
Defendant:
Robert E. Cooper, Jr. , Tony Clark , Barry Staubus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Crouse et al
as 3:2012cv00920
Plaintiff:
Guy H Cox
Defendant:
Tommy R Crouse , T & D Trucking of Joyce and American Alternative Insurance Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana
as 3:2012cv00390
Plaintiff:
Mitchell H Cox
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana and Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Co
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
COX v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv58913
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. COX
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
