Cases 21 - 30 of 43,568
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-1484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Gilbert v. Holmes
as 3:2025cv00018
Plaintiff:
Tamika Latasha Gilbert
Defendant:
Brian Holmes, CPL. Ganey, Bairentine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matwyuk #289243 v. Jantzen et al
as 3:2025cv08048
Plaintiff:
Philip Steven Matwyuk
Defendant:
Lee F Jantzen, Anni Hill Foster, Brian Y Furuya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Unit T6 Psych Tech J.R.
as 4:2025cv02420
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant:
Unit T6 Psych Tech J.R.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Wellpath Medical Provider et al
as 3:2025cv00333
Plaintiff:
Hubert Duwayne Hill
Defendant:
Wellpath Medical Provider, Cleveland Rayford, Dr. Ampadu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal-Hill v. Warden of FCI-Allenwood Medium
as 1:2025cv00436
Petitioner:
DeAndre Lenier Neal-Hill
Respondent:
Warden of FCI-Allenwood Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Salido v. Hill et al
as 3:2025cv00561
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Salido
Defendant:
James Hill, Steven Stallings and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Khan v. Half Hollow Hills Central School District et al
as 2:2025cv01324
Plaintiff:
Jane Khan
Defendant:
Half Hollow Hills Central School District, Dr. Michael Catapano and Dr. Patrick Harrigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv01252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
