Cases 21 - 30 of 292
Horsley v. Cates
as 1:2023at00708
Petitioner:
Allen Ray Horsley
Defendant:
Acting Warden Brian Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Danielle Horsley v. Otis Elevator Company et al
as 2:2023cv04514
Plaintiff:
Danielle Horsley
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company and Does 1 to 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Doyle v. Draper et al
as 7:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
David Blane Doyle
Defendant:
Sheriff Steve Draper, 1st Lt. Law, Capt. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. County of Santa Clara, et al
as 22-16855
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, JEFFREY F. ROSEN, District Attorney, County of Santa Clara, JOHN CHASE, Deputy District Attorney, County of Santa Clara and others
Norman Horsley v. William Wardwell
as 23-35127
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORMAN HORSLEY, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM WARDWELL, Individually and as Trustee of the Shirley Packer Trust
Horsley v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv21352
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Horsley
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2185
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
US v. Quentin Horsley
as 22-4671
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
QUENTIN LOWELL HORSLEY
Alexander v. Trent et al
as 7:2022cv00488
Plaintiff:
John Hunter Alexander
Defendant:
Timothy Trent, Chad Lipscomb, Kimberly Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
