Cases 21 - 29 of 29
HASTINGS v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv35166
Plaintiff:
ELLIOT J HASTINGS
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
FIREMEN'S INSURANCE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, D.C. v. TYCO THERMAL CONTROLS, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv00179
Plaintiff:
FIREMEN'S INSURANCE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, D.C.
Defendant:
TYCO THERMAL CONTROLS, LLC , RAYCHEM CORPORATION and MICKEY J. HASTINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maciel v. Thomas J. Hastings Properties, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv12167
Plaintiff:
Donna Maciel
Defendant:
Thomas J. Hastings Properties, Inc., Thomas Hastings, Michael Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Samuel Hastings v. Gregory Knowlin
as 10-7459
Petitioner - Appellant:
SAMUEL J. HASTINGS
Respondent - Appellee:
GREGORY KNOWLIN, Warden
HASTINGS et al v. ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv79433
Plaintiff:
JENNINGS J. HASTINGS
Receiver:
FRANCES V. HASTINGS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY, EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., GAF CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graham Medical Technologies, LLC v. Akron Medical, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv14905
Plaintiff:
Graham Medical Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Akron Medical, Inc. and Robert J Hastings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type:
Other Statutes
Hastings v. Knowlin
as 1:2009cv01412
Petitioner:
Samuel J Hastings
Respondent:
Gregory Knowlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hastings v. Knowlin
as 0:2009cv01412
Petitioner:
Samuel J Hastings
Respondent:
Gregory Knowlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HASTINGS v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv66370
Plaintiff:
NELLIE J. HASTINGS
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, CERTAIN TEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
