Cases 21 - 30 of 61
Corielus v. Prasad et al
as 1:2018cv00272
Plaintiff:
Liventon Corielus
Defendant:
Prasad, P.A., Ben Oakes, Michael Sheahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corielus v. Prasad et al
as 1:2017cv06653
Defendant:
Sergeant J. Ayer, Alikevan Entrence, Carl J. Koenigsmann and others
Plaintiff:
Liventon Corielus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Muniz et al
as 3:2017cv04955
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Gibson
Defendant:
Muniz, R. Gonzales, J. Ayers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ayers v. Lane County Jail
as 6:2017cv00766
Plaintiff:
Joshua J. Ayers
Defendant:
Lane County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corielus v. Prasad et al
as 1:2017cv00233
Plaintiff:
Liventon Corielus
Defendant:
Prasad, Ben Oakes, Michael Sheahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corielus v. Prasad et al
as 1:2016cv07155
Defendant:
Sergeant J. Ayer, Assistant Dr. Ben Oakes, Dr. Prasad and others
Plaintiff:
Liventon Corielus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavis v. Schroeder
as 16-2793
Plaintiff - Appellant:
George Chavis
Defendant - Appellee:
H. Kenneth Schroeder, S. Wenderlinch, Lieutenant J. Lamanna and others
Ramos v. NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner et al
as 1:2015fp00261
Defendant:
J. Ayers, Heide Guiani, Helen Hanks and others
Notice Only:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
Chris A. Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West v. Ayers
as 4:2015cv01653
Plaintiff:
Mark Steven West
Defendant:
Randall J Ayers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ayers et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv13616
Plaintiff:
Betsy J. Ayers and Thomas Ayers
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
