Cases 21 - 30 of 75,047
Chan et al v. Stefanski et al
as 3:2024cv03631
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Chan, Shaynna Myers, Stefan Ascierto and others
Defendant:
John Stefanski, City of San Rafael and Robert Sinnott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
IN RE: 23ANDME, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation
as 3:2024md03098
Defendant:
23andMe, Inc. and 23ANDME Holding Co
Plaintiff:
Michele Bacus, Paula Kleynburd, Camie Picha and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Davalos et al v. GGC-Baltimore, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01733
Plaintiff:
Tara Leigh Patrick, Jessica Hinton, Rosie Wicks and others
Defendant:
GGC-Baltimore, LLC doing business as The Gentlemen's Gold Club, Jean Malkiewicz and Diane Kozel
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jones v. The City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv02790
Plaintiff:
Neal Jones
Defendant:
The City of Jackson, Mississippi, Mississippi State Department of Health and Trilogy Engineering Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. The City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv02789
Plaintiff:
Nia Jones
Defendant:
The City of Jackson, Mississippi, Mississippi State Department of Health and Trilogy Engineering Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. State of California et al
as 4:2024cv03594
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Jones
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation (CDCR), Ralph Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amazon.com, Inc. et al v. Adzasoo et al
as 2:2024cv05070
Petitioner:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Logistics, Inc.
Respondent:
Mawuili Adzasoo, Mohammad Albasha, David Oliver Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
