Cases 21 - 30 of 35
McCarthy #711386 v. Perry
as 2:2017cv00126
Petitioner:
Brian Joseph McCarthy #711386
Respondent:
Mitch Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pitkin et al v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv02235
Defendant:
CJ Buchanan, Corizon Health, Inc., Corizon Health, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Pitkin and Russell Pitkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pitkin et al v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv02230
Defendant:
CJ Buchanan, Corizon Health, Inc., Louisa Duru and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Pitkin and Russell Pitkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez v. McCarthy Jr. et al
as 2:2016cv13328
Plaintiff:
Mario Huerta Rodriguez
Defendant:
Joseph McCarthy, Jr., Toby Marshall, Michael Bunk and others
Heilbrun v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2016cv01052
Defendant:
David Christenson, City of Portland, Corizon Medical Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Heilbrun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCarthy et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2015cv12935
Plaintiff:
Lillie McCarthy and Joseph McCarthy
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Muhammad v. Nixa et al
as 1:2015cv04069
Plaintiff:
Miykael Muhammad
Defendant:
Daniel Nixa, John McGuire, City Of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodges v. Corizon Health, Inc., et al
as 6:2015cv00521
Defendant:
Clackamas County, Corizon Health, Inc., Trang Tran and others
Plaintiff:
Hodges and David Hodges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2014cv09905
Plaintiff:
Brian Henderson and Eugene Hoffman
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Joseph McCarthy, Richard Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCarthy v. O'Brien et al
as 2:2013cv00070
Plaintiff:
John Joseph McCarthy
Defendant:
Terry O'Brien, John Doe, John Doe, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
