Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Carlton et al v. TIN, Inc.
as 2:2012cv02367
Plaintiff:
Kathi S Carlton , James Carlton, Jr. , Otis O Magee and others
Defendant:
TIN, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Bloodworth v. Carlton
as 5:2012ct03175
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lee Bloodworth
Defendant:
James Carlton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00452
Plaintiff:
Robert Nichols , James Carlton , Dauna Patel and others
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Thomas P Schmalzried
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nichols et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv04748
Plaintiff:
Robert Nichols , James Carlton , Dauna Patel and others
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Thomas P. Schmalzried
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carey v. Carlton et al (INMATE 1)(CONSENT)
as 3:2011cv00690
Plaintiff:
Andrew Carey
Defendant:
James Carlton , Johnny Leonard and Vivian Langford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKeithen v. Jackson et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2011cv00190
Plaintiff:
Orlando Samuel McKeithen
Defendant:
Cathy Jackson, Juanice Cole, James Carlton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burton v. Carlton et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2011cv00139
Plaintiff:
Tommy David Burton
Defendant:
James Carlton, Diana Etheridge, Kathy Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McAlpine v. Allen et al
as 1:2010cv00407
Plaintiff:
Kenneth McAlpine
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Correctional Medical Services, James Carlton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Allen et al
as 2:2010cv00657
Plaintiff:
Darrell Williams
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Vernon Barnett, James DeLoach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKeithen v. Jackson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2010cv00581
Plaintiff:
Orlando Samuel McKeithen
Defendant:
Sgt. Jackson, Sgt. Coleman, James Carlton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
