Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Grishan v. Jones et al
as 6:2020cv06156
Defendant:
Members of US Congress, John Doe Director of DEA, Judge Barry Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Albert Grishan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burchfield v. Jones et al
as 6:2020cv06150
Defendant:
Members of US Congress, John Doe Director of DEA, Judge Barry Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley C. Burchfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Murray v. State Warden, et al
as 20-1830
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES M. MURRAY
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and STATE WARDEN
KAVANAGH v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv02163
Defendant:
GREGORY T. MONAHAN, MARK T. ESPER, JOHN DOES 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
ISABELLA KAVANAGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2020cv01620
Defendant:
GREGORY T. MONAHAN, JOHN POES (1-100), WILLIAM J. WALKER and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN ROTH and NO PARTY
Not Classified By Court:
JAMES C. MCCONVILLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ROTH v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv01622
Defendant:
GREGORY T. MONAHAN, WILLIAM J. WALKER, JAMES C. MCCONVILLE and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN ROTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BUCHANAN et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv01542
Defendant:
GREGORY T. MONAHAN, MARK T. ESPER, WILLIAM J. WALKER and others
Plaintiff:
LINDSAY FIELD, ANN DAGRIN and RADIYA BUCHANAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
PADILLA v. BERNHARDT et al
as 1:2020cv01517
Defendant:
Gregory T. Monahan, DAVID VELA, JAMES M. MURRAY and others
Plaintiff:
NORKA PADILLA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
WILLIAMS v. MURRAY et al
as 1:2020cv00195
Defendant:
ROBERT YOUNG, JAMES M MURRAY and MICHAEL SAUSCHUCK
Plaintiff:
KHALIF WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
