Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014mc00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
PARSON v. MORRIS et al
as 4:2014cv00077
Plaintiff:
JAMES PARSON
Defendant:
PAUL MORRIS, BASSEY and JEREMY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Parsons v. Unknown Simon, et al
as 13-17004
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN JAMES PARSONS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN SIMON, DPS Sgt. #4687, UNKNOWN SCHMIDT, DPS Officer #7035 and UNKNOWN HOPKINS, DPS Officer #6536
Robert James Parsons II v. William Joseph Fisher et al
as 2:2013cv06438
Defendant:
William Joseph Fisher and John Todd Myers
Plaintiff:
Robert James Parsons, II
Parsons v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2013cv00718
Plaintiff:
John James Parsons
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Arizona Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parsons et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv09323
Plaintiff:
Pamela Gay Parsons and James Parsons, Jr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PARSONS v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as PAE/2:12-cv-01809
Plaintiff:
JAMES PARSONS
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 3
PARSONS v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv01809
Plaintiff:
JAMES PARSONS
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Akines et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00612
Plaintiff:
Brenda Akines, Regina Banks, Lesslie Bishop and others
Defendant:
John Does 1 through 3 and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Parson v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 9:2008cv80468
Petitioner:
Donald James Parson
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
