Cases 21 - 30 of 4,300
Puchner v. Maxwell et al
as 2:2024cv00478
Petitioner:
John D Puchner
Respondent:
Mike Maxwell, Lisa Neubauer, Eric Severson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ferrara v. Barnett
as 24-50303
Plaintiff:
John D. Ferrara
Defendant:
Jeffrey Blake Barnett, Police Chief for the City of Kyle and City of Kyle
RIETH et al v. UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA), INC. et al
as 1:2024cv04671
Plaintiff:
JOHN D RIETH and ANNE RIETH
Defendant:
UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA), INC., UNITED RENTALS, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Murphy v. Slootman et al
as 1:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Patrick M. Murphy, Jr.
Defendant:
Frank Slootman, Michael P. Scarpelli, Benoit Dageville and others
LAKE CHARLES MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv00972
Plaintiff:
LAKE CHARLES MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, SAN GABRIEL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, ANAHEIM REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Livermon v. State of Virginia et al
as 4:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Juan Livermon
Defendant:
State of Virginia, Virginia State Troopers, John D. Mayoras and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Middleton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval County)
as 3:2024cv00262
Petitioner:
John D. Middleton
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sasser v. Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01869
Plaintiff:
Andrew Sasser
Defendant:
Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc., David Harris, Hannah Craven and others
Oak 44 Property Management, LLC v. Maddix et al
as 5:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Oak 44 Property Management, LLC and John D Gaston
Respondent:
Justin Maddix, Stephen Wood, Lexington 859 Service, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
