Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Davis v. Pepsico, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04551
Plaintiff:
Josh Davis
Defendant:
Naked Juice Co., Naked Juice Co. of Glendora, Inc., Naked Juice Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Mahoney v. Hearst Corporation, et al
as 15-1518
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN E. MAHONEY
Defendant - Appellee:
HEARST CORPORATION and WMUR-TV
Defendant:
JOSH DAVIS, Reporter
Brandt v. McNelly et al
as 4:2015cv00247
Plaintiff:
Jerry Brandt
Defendant:
Dale McNelly , La Grange City Police Chief Dale McNelly , Jeff Curl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brandt v. McNelly et al
as 2:2015cv00007
Plaintiff:
Jerry Brandt
Defendant:
Dale McNelly , La Grange City Police Chief Dale McNelly , Jeff Curl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shing-Hon v. Anderson et al
as 4:2012cv00185
Plaintiff:
Christopher A Shing-Hon
Defendant:
Jeff Anderson, Sean Murray, Christopher Osterberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kunkler v. Still et al
as 2:2011cv00509
Plaintiff:
Randall Kunkler, Jr.
Defendant:
Mark Still and Josh Davies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Shing-Hon v. Murray et al
as 4:2010cv00149
Plaintiff:
Christopher A Shing-Hon
Defendant:
Sean Murray, Christopher Osterberg, Jeff Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Palmer v. Sequoyah County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 6:2007cv00012
Plaintiff:
Dennis Palmer
Defendant:
Sequoyah County Board of County Commissioners, Sequoyah County Board of County Commissioners, Johnny Philpot and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
