Cases 21 - 30 of 239
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gibson v. K R J S Corporation
as 1:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Gibson
Defendant:
K R J S Corporation doing business as Kavi Gupta Gallery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
O'Flaherty et al v. United States Marshall Service et al
as 1:2023cv00389
Plaintiff:
Neal Patrick O'Flaherty and Dylan O'Flaherty
Defendant:
United States Marshall Service, New Mexico State Police, Torrance County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Perry v. Holmes
as 22-20657
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gerald Allen Perry
Defendant / Appellee:
John B. Holmes, Former District Attorney of Harris County, Steve Baldassano, Former Assistant District Attorney of Harris County, Boyol Smith, Sergeant and others
K.R. v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 1:2022cv02186
Plaintiff:
K. R., LAKESHA MOFFITT and ANDRE ROBINSON
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
R. et al
as 1:2022cv02175
Plaintiff:
K. R., LAKESHA MOFFITT, ANDRE ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
R. et al v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 1:2022cv02173
Plaintiff:
K. R., LAKESHA MOFFITT and ANDRE ROBINSON
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith v. State of Florida et al
as 8:2022cv02454
Plaintiff:
Patti Smith and Patti Elizabeth Smith
Defendant:
State of Florida, State of Tennessee, K. R. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
K.R.L. v. Red Roof Inns, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03773
Plaintiff:
K. R. L.
Defendant:
Red Roof Inns, Inc. and Red Roof Franchising, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
