Cases 21 - 30 of 136
Mikeyla Mitchell v. GEICO Corporate Office
as 21-2054
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIKEYLA K. MITCHELL
Defendant / Appellee:
GEICO CORPORATE OFFICE and IMPACT MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
Mitchell v. USA
as 5:2021cv06104
Petitioner:
Nathaniel K Mitchell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv06641
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mitchell v. GEICO Corporate Office et al
as 2:2021cv00434
Plaintiff:
Mikeyla K. Mitchell
Defendant:
GEICO Corporate Office and Impact Mental Health Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03814
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mitchell v. EEOC, et al
as 2:2021cv00222
Defendant:
United States of America and EEOC
Plaintiff:
Mikeyla K. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Simonetta Sutton v. Mountain High Investments, LLC, et al
as 21-1346
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIMONETTA VESPUCCI SUTTON
Defendant / Appellee:
BOWMAN K. MITCHELL, MOUNTAIN HIGH INVESTMENTS, LLC, PREMIUM HOMES REALTY, LLC and others
Mitchell v. Unknown
as 2:2021cv00180
Petitioner:
Mikeyla K. Mitchell
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mitchell v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2021cv00171
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Mikeylah K. Mitchell
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
